home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Path: mother.usf.edu!com1!rsecan
- From: rsecan@com1.med.usf.edu (Ryan A. Secan)
- Newsgroups: comp.sys.newton.misc,comp.sys.amiga.applications
- Subject: Re: Users are selfish Was Re: crippled software
- Followup-To: comp.sys.newton.misc,comp.sys.amiga.applications
- Date: 10 Mar 1996 00:47:32 GMT
- Organization: University of South Florida
- Message-ID: <4ht8r4$c1f@mother.usf.edu>
- References: <150773@cup.portal.com> <4lCkP4eSMV1ZEHpSJ2@transarc.com> <5r68cgwjsj.fsf_-_@ritz.mordor.com>
- Reply-To: rsecan@com1.med.usf.edu
- NNTP-Posting-Host: com1.med.usf.edu
- X-Newsreader: TIN [version 1.2 PL2]
-
- : I know this thread is starting to go out of context for this group,
- : but I felt a strong need participate.
-
- : I couldn't agree with Sanjay more; the overwhelming majority of users
- : just can't be trusted to pay their fair share for uncrippled software
- : they use. I've been in a similar situation as a shareware author. I
- : spent hundreds and hundreds of hours, over the course of 2 years,
- : developing what I thought was useful and practical software (if anyone
- : happened to be curious, it's called Fitter for the Amiga). I tried to
- : make it a solid application, complete with online context sensitive
- : help, and loads of options and information to change on the fly.
-
- : Because at the time, *I* hated the concept of crippled/timed out
- : software, right up until the last version, I distributed it as "on
- : your honor" shareware. I think I gave a much better than average try
- : to support and accomodate users who had requests for enhancements and
- : changes; I never ignored an email, and even in the latest cases,
- : responded in under three days, despite my busy agenda.
-
- : With the exception of two that were major undertakings, I made every
- : enhancement/change that was requested, and fixed every bug reported
- : that I (or more than one user) could reproduce.
-
- : Despite the meagre $7 (US) fee I asked for this full featured
- : application, I received only ONE registration over the past 3 years.
-
- : Unfortunately, it seems that the average user is just not honest
- : ....unless they're forced to be because a package is crippled. I
- : deeply regret not doing it.
-
- : It seems that everyone has some lame justification:
-
- : "Well, I like it, but I want it to have <xxx> feature so I'm not
- : registering it until the author puts it in.."
-
- : "I found a bug, and therefore, it doesn't deserve to be registered"
-
- : "Joe Blow didn't register it, and he's using it, so I won't register
- : either."
-
- : .
- : .
- : you get the point.
-
- : It's a shame; I had always hoped shareware would be the wave of the
- : 90s for home used software. It's the very users that complain about
- : crippled software that contribute to that problem of crippled software
- : the most (and notice that I've acknowledged cripped software *is* a
- : problem; I don't like it either)
-
- : Actually, I did get something from my experience, and that's just it-
- : experience, in large application C projects, which is making me lots
- : of money now :)
-
- : BTW Sanjay, my fee's on it's way
-
- : -Joe
-
- One point that I would like to make, is that while I don't mind paying
- shareware fees for programs that I use, I find it REALLY frustrating to
- go the trouble of downloading a shareware demo only to find that since it
- was uploaded a long time ago, the trial period has expired before I even
- try it. Please , all of you shareware developers , keep making good
- products, but if you are going to cripple them, makle the period start
- after download, NOT after upload.
-
- Thanks,
-
- Ryan
-
-
-